The Impact Feed
Aid Cuts, Summarized
Your quick read on the shifts unfolding across countries as U.S. aid cuts take effect. Every two weeks (or faster when news warrants it), we spotlight one theme and share the most revealing pieces of reporting or research behind it.
Explore the aggregated headlines below for all recent curated stories related to the U.S. aid cuts.
-
Women’s rights in the crossfire
Making good on their promise, the first week of the second Trump Administration brought executive orders banning diversity, equity, and inclusion and “gender ideology” programming and initiatives. While many in the global development community had mistakenly believed women’s empowerment and gender-based violence prevention programming would continue as in the past, these programs were nearly universally terminated. Bipartisan legislation like the Women, Peace & Security Act was singled out as ‘woke’ and unceremoniously sidelined. And despite the fanfare of the Women’s Global Development and Prosperity Initiative, launched by Ivanka Trump in 2019, the second Trump Administration seems to have entirely disassociated from women’s empowerment.
Now, a year into Trump 2.0, world powers and international organizations battle for influence during a tense Commission on the Status of Women. Already, the U.S. has set forth a sweeping new set of restrictive funding policies, dramatically expanding the Mexico City Policy, which blocks U.S. federal funding to international nongovernmental organizations that provide or inform about abortion. The new rules surpass previous limits to include gender ideology and diversity, equity, and inclusion, along with expansion to a new cadre of recipients — including U.N. agencies.
While the fight for women’s rights — and what can or should be included under it — plays out, the effects of the 2025 aid cuts are unfolding around the world. Lifesaving support programs for young girls at risk of HIV have been terminated in Kenya; behavior change work to save mother’s lives in Nepal has shuttered; and survivors of sexual violence in Honduras can no longer find safe spaces to recover. Political discourse aside, these stories show that women’s freedoms and lives have been caught in the crossfire of the aid cuts already.
What we’re reading:
Why supporting a shelter for women is now 'kind of radioactive' [NPR]
In Nepal, US ends effort to help women make life-or-death choices [Devex]
Life after DREAMS: Kenya’s girls navigate HIV risk without US support[Devex]
How Trump’s new global gag rules will undermine US interests abroad [Just Security]
-
Life-saving aid questioned, cut
Before the foreign aid review was finalized in 2025, waivers were issued for emergency life-saving work. As Secretary of State Rubio’s initial memo explained, this was meant to include core life-saving medicine, medical services, food, and shelter, as well as supplies and reasonable administrative costs necessary to deliver such assistance.
Though this process was marred with setbacks and confusion, waivers began to trickle down in the weeks after the stop-work order. Some of the organizations lucky enough to receive one had partial exemptions, some received waivers for one week, while others could continue their program for the full 90 days of the review period. In the chaos that followed, researchers predicted catastrophic numbers of lives lost. While some of these numbers have not played out as feared, the drawdown of sustained support for the activities of humanitarian organizations — including those of the World Food Programme and U.N. Refugee Agency — have meant that many lifesaving programs have, in fact, ended.
In the past week, the Trump administration has made clear that lifesaving aid would end for at least seven African countries. Even with a $2 billion commitment to the United Nations’ lead humanitarian agency, it appears that emergency aid may continue to be stuck in limbo as the tensions across the U.S. government and the industry it disrupted continue to play out.
What we’re reading:
The Trump Administration is ending aid that it says saves lives [The Atlantic]
Afghans ‘desperate’ as aid cuts bring mass hunger crisis[Devex]
‘I fear for my daughter’s future’: Families in Zimbabwe struggle to survive a year after Trump’s aid cuts [The Independent]
Post-USAID, Kenyans’ access to HIV and maternal medicine and contraceptives plunge [Health Policy Watch]
How bad are Trump’s aid cuts now Congress is fighting back?[The Independent]
-
U.S. leadership on democracy and rights transformed
For decades after World War II, the U.S. invested heavily in democracy, rights, and governance — known as DRG — programs. But, in early 2025, the Trump administration cut an estimated 97% of USAID’s DRG portfolio. These disruptions have brought the end of election monitoring and outreach efforts, canceled support for independent media and labor unions, and terminated emergency protection for human rights defenders and civil society activists. (Though, it seems the U.S. isn’t the only donor pulling back its DRG assistance these days.)
At the same time, U.S. engagement on democracy and human rights has not completely halted. The State Department’s Bureau of Democracy, Rights and Labor continues to operate, having lost less than half of its total programs in the initial funding freeze. But changes to its structure and redirection of its stated goals may affect the types of DRG work we see from the U.S. going forward.
What we’re reading:
Disarming the global free press [Columbia Journalism Review]
How US foreign aid cuts put garment worker rights on a precipice [Financial Times]
Who will stand up for human rights in 2026 – and how? [Just Security]
The logical end point of ‘America First’ foreign aid [The Atlantic]
A year after aid cuts, the image of American power shifts under Trump [The Washington Post]
-
One year on
When the Trump administration took office in January 2025, few predicted the scale of disruption that would ripple across the global development industry. Now, one year on, recent reporting has sought to take stock of what has been lost — and what risks still lie ahead.
Many health programs remain in a state of funding limbo, forcing governments to explore new financing strategies even while research models estimate rising death and disease rates. Similarly, global emergency response systems have been significantly constrained. In its first test since the dismantling of USAID, delivery of relief assistance went to Cuba nearly three months after Hurricane Melissa made landfall. But, many continue to articulate that the funding shocks present both a crisis and a potential inflection point for reforming the international humanitarian system.
Notably, certain predictions have not come to pass. In the wake of the Trump administration’s sweeping foreign aid cuts, policy experts were quick to predict that China would use the moment to exert and expand its soft power, especially in its Asian backyard. But nearly a year after the dismantling of USAID, that prediction has not materialized, our own reporting finds.
What we’re reading:
The painful, seismic shift in humanitarian aid—and what’s next [Carnegie Endowment for International Peace]
One year post-USAID, global health funding stuck in limbo [Think Global Health]
One year later: the effect of US ‘chainsaw’ on global health [Health Policy Watch]
One year after USAID cuts, Jordan’s reliance on Washington is laid bare [The National]
After USAID exit, China hasn't moved to fill Asia’s funding gap[Devex]
-
Hunger deepens
Recent reporting shows that U.S. aid cuts — particularly to the World Food Programme (WFP) — are rapidly deepening hunger across Africa and in fragile states. Funding shortfalls have forced WFP to slash rations, close nutrition programs, and turn away the vast majority of people in need. Other humanitarian actors have also reduced services as broader funding dried up, with children, refugees, and women bearing the brunt as safety nets collapse.
In Kenya, reductions in food assistance have coincided with rising child malnutrition and preventable deaths as safety nets collapse amid drought and high food prices. In Malawi, refugees report skipping meals and selling basic necessities as distributions shrink. Across multiple countries, WFP now says it can reach only a small fraction of hungry people due to lack of funds and is preparing to lay off up to 30% of its staff by 2026, reducing capacity even where aid still exists.
What we’re reading:
-
Food systems unravel
House Democrats are demanding answers after reports that U.S.-purchased food aid was left to spoil following the dismantling of USAID. In a letter to U.S. Department of State and USAID acting inspectors-general, Gabe Amo, a Democrat from Rhode Island and Gregory W. Meeks, a Democrat from New York, raised concerns that the Trump administration has not disclosed the scale of the losses, requesting more information about oversight, supply chain failures, and potential misuse of congressionally appropriated funds.
What we’re reading
The Trump administration’s flip-flop on treating malnourished children — Devex
As US hunger rises, Trump administration’s efficiency goals cause massive food waste — The Conversation
‘No more food’ in northern Nigeria: US funding cuts bite for aid groups — Al Jazeera
From Food Aid to Dog Chow? How Trump’s Cuts Hurt Kansas Farmers — The New York Times
US aid cuts leave food for millions mouldering in storage — Reuters
-
Security vacuums widen
Recent coverage highlights that cuts to early-warning, peacebuilding, and stabilization programs are driving spikes in violence.
What we’re reading:
In Mozambique, an ISIS insurgency is newly energized as US cuts impact aid program — CNN
Trump cut Nigeria’s aid back in March. Now he wonders why it’s so violent — LA Times
The cuts that bleed: What happens when peace programs go dark — Devex
‘The cartels and clans are ecstatic’: How USAID cuts have emboldened Colombia’s narcos — The Telegraph
In Boko Haram’s birthplace, USAID’s collapse threatens a school for victims of extremism — AP

